I am thinking of possible axes to compare the mentioned messaging solutions, like the ones below. For example, a multi-stage design might include raw input data consumed from Kafka topics in stage 1. It is written in Scala and Java and based on the publish-subscribe model of messaging. Setting-up and maintaining Kafka often requires significant technical resources, which comes with man hours billing for setup and 24/7 ongoing operational burden of managing your own infrastructure. Like Apache Kafka, Amazon Kinesis is also a publish and subscribe messaging solution, however, it is offered as a managed service in the AWS cloud, and unlike Kafka cannot be run on-premise. Like many of the offerings from Amazon Web Services, Amazon Kinesis software is modeled after an existing Open Source system. Moreover, the Kinesis costs are reduced normally with time automatically based on how much your workload is typical to the Amazon. Kafka runs on a cluster in a distributed environment, which may span over multiple data centers. Both Kafka and Kinesis are often utilized as an integration system in enterprise environments similar to traditional message pub/sub systems. Kinesis will take you a couple of hours max. Hope this helps, let me know if I missed anything or if you’d like more detail in a particular area. I’m not sure if there is an equivalent of Kafka Streams / KSQL for Kinesis. Additionally, Apache Kafka … Kinesis doesn’t offer an on-premises solution. Kinesis ensures availability and durability of data by synchronously replicating data across three availability zones. Each topic is divided into multiple partitions and each broker stores one or more of those partitions. With Kinesis data can be analyzed by lambda before it gets sent to S3 or RedShift. This article compares between Apache Kafka and Amazon Kinesis based on the decision points such as setup, maintenance, costs, performance, and incidence risk management. The ordering of credits and debits matters. Amazon Kinesis has a built-in cross replication while Kafka requires configuration to be performed on your own. However, monitoring, scaling, managing and maintaining servers, software, and security of the clusters would still create IT overhead (There are also fully managed services offered by Confluent as well as Amazon Managed Kafka). ... One big difference between Kafka vs… [Kafka] [Kinesis] Kafka Connect Kafka-rest Kafka-Pixy Kastle AWS API Gateway HTTP API ETL ETL 7 10. A producer can be any source of data – a web based application, a connected IoT device, or any data producing system. Kinesis is a fully-managed streaming processing service that’s available on Amazon Web Services (AWS). Common use cases include website activity tracking for real-time monitoring, recommendations, etc. In Kinesis, this is called a shard while Kafka calls it a partition. In the last post, we compared Apache Kafka and AWS Kinesis Data Streams . The Consumer – such as a custom application, Apache hadoop, Apache Storm running on Amazon EC2, an Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream, or Amazon Simple Storage Service S3 – processes the data in real time. I believe an attempt for the equivalent of pre-built integration for Kinesis is Kinesis Data Firehose. Difference Between Kafka and Kinesis. Amazon Kinesis has a built-in cross replication while Kafka requires configuration to be performed on your own. Once you have your stream processing in place, you’ll want to make sure you have the right tools to integrate and analyze streaming data. Amazon Kinesis. But if you send 1 TB per day, Kinesis is somewhat cheaper ($158/month vs… For the data flowing through Kafka or Kinesis, Kinesis refers to this as a “Data Record” whereas Kafka will refer to this as an Event or a Message interchangeably. Making a decision on which streaming platform to use is based on the metrics you want to achieve and the business use case. Multiple producers and consumers can publish and retrieve messages at the same time. I’ll make updates to the content below, but let me know if any questions or concerns. A topic is designed to store data streams in ordered and partitioned immutable sequence of records. Please let me know. Tuning Apache Kafka for optimal throughput and latency require tuning of Kafka producers and Kafka consumers. Example: you’d like to land messages from Kafka or Kinesis into ElasticSearch. To start using Kafka, I create two EC2 instances in the same VPC, one will be a producer and one a consumer. In this case, Kinesis is appears to be modeled after a combination of pub/sub solutions like RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ with regards to the maximum retention period of 7 days and Kafka in other ways such as sharding. Kinesis itself is like 3 separate services really in kinesis data streams (the one you are talking about), kinesis firehose, and kinesis data analytic level … Many organizations dealing with stream processing or similar use-cases debate whether to use open-source Kafka or to use Amazon’s managed Kinesis service as data streaming platforms. In this article, I will compare Apache Kafka and AWS Kinesis. On top of that, Amazon Kinesis takes care of provisioning, deployment, on-going maintenance of hardware, software or other services of data streams for you. On the other hand, Kinesis is comparatively easier to setup than Apache Kafka and may take a maximum of couple of hours to setup a production ready stream processing solution. Chant it with me now, Your email address will not be published. Share! AWS Kinesis comprises of key concepts such as Data … Kinesis, … What is Apache Presto and Why You Should Use It, Spark Structured Streaming Vs. Apache Spark Streaming. Advantage: Kinesis, by a mile. Cross-replication is the idea of syncing data across logical or physical data centers. As long as a really good monitoring system is in place for Kafka that is capable of on-time alerting of any failures and a 24/7 team of DevOps taking care of potential failures and recovery, there is a less risk of incidence. Since this original post, AWS has released MSK. At first glance, Kinesis has a feature set that looks like it can solve any problem: it can store terabytes of data, it can replay old messages, and it can support multiple message consumers. It is a fully managed service that integrates really well with other AWS services. Get a free trial of Upsolver or check out our previous guide to Apache Kafka with or without a Data Lake. Following are some metrics and decision points to compare whether to choose Apache Kafka or Amazon Kinesis as a data streaming solution: Apache Kafka takes days to weeks to setup a full-fledge production ready environment, based on the expertise you have in your team. Kafka Connect has a rich ecosystem of pre-built Kafka Connectors. As with most tech decisions, there is no single right answer to which streaming solution to use. Applications send data streams to a partition via Producers, which can then be consumed and processed by other applications via Consumers – e.g., to get insights on data through analytics applications. More and more applications and enterprises are building architectures which include processing pipelines consisting of multiple stages. Apache Kafka is an open-source stream-processing software developed by LinkedIn (and later donated to Apache) to effectively manage their growing data and switch to real-time processing from batch-processing. When designing Workiva’s durable messaging system we took a hard look at using Amazon’s Kinesis as the message storage and delivery mechanism. With Kinesis you pay for use, by buying read … Kinesis data streams are marketed as aws’s kafka service. Featured image credit https://flic.kr/p/7XWaia, Share! Alternatively, If you are looking for a managed solution or you do not have time or expertise and budget at the moment to setup and take care of distributed infrastructure, and you only want to focus on your application, you might lean towards Amazon Kinesis. The distributed nature of the Kafka framework is designed to be fault-tolerant. Apache Kafka was started as a general-purpose publish and subscribe messaging system and eventually evolved as a fully developed horizontally scalable, fault-tolerant, and highly performant streaming platform. The Kafka Cluster consists of many Kafka Brokers on many servers. The throughput of a Kinesis stream is configurable to increase by increasing the number of shards with in a datastream. Choosing the data streaming solution may depend on company resources, engineering culture, monetary budget and aforementioned decision points. Choosing the streaming data solution is not always straightforward. AWS Glue maybe? In stage 2, data is consumed and then aggregated, enriched, or otherwise transformed. The Kinesis Producer continuously pushes data to Kinesis … Broker sometimes refers to more of a logical system or as Kafka as a whole. While Kinesis might seem like the more cloud-native solution, a Kafka Cluster can also be deployed on Amazon EC2, which provides a reliable and scalable infrastructure platform. So, if you can live with vendor-lockin and limited scalability, latency, SLAs and cost, then it might be the right choice for you. Share! To set them up as client machines, I download and extract the Kafka … Also, since the original post, Kinesis has been separated into multiple “services” such as Kinesis Video Streams, Data Streams, Data Firehose, and Data Analytics. In Kafka, data is stored in partitions. Apache Kafka Architecture – Delivery Guarantees. Since it is a managed-service, AWS manages the infrastructure, storage, networking, and configurations needed to stream data on your behalf. Ongoing ops (human costs) It also might be worth adding that there can be a big difference between the ongoing burden of running your own infrastructure vs. paying AWS … Plugging in the current prices and not taking into account the free tier, if you send 1 GB of messages per day at the maximum message size, Kinesis will cost much more than SQS ($10.82/month for Kinesis vs. $0.20/month for SQS). With Kinesis – as a managed-service,  Amazon itself takes care of the high-availability of the system so these are less likely to occur. The canonical example of the importance of ordering is bank or inventory scenarios. If you don’t have need for scale, strict ordering, hybrid cloud architectures, exactly-once semantics, it can be a perfectly fine choice. Apache Kafka and Amazon Kinesis are two of the more widely adopted messaging queue systems. Apache Kafka and Amazon Kinesis both provide robust features, but they also have a few limitations. Kafka guarantees the order of messages in partitions while Kinesis does not. Apache Kafka. Resources for Data Engineers and Data Architects. Cross … The key advantage of AWS Kinesis is its deep integration into AWS ecosystem. The Kafka-Kinesis-Connector is a connector to be used with Kafka Connect to publish messages from Kafka to Amazon Kinesis Streams or Amazon Kinesis Firehose.. Kafka-Kinesis-Connector for Firehose is used to publish messages from Kafka … Cross-replication is not mandatory, and you should consider doing so only if you need it. Let’s consider that for a moment. The Kinesis Producer continuously pushes data to Kinesis Streams. Instance usage (in hours) = 31 days x 24 hrs/day x 2 brokers = 1,488 hours x $0.0456 (price per hour for a kafka… Kinesis, created by Amazon and hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS), prides itself on real-time message processing for hundreds of gigabytes of data from thousands of data sources. Apache Kafka … aws kafka describe-cluster --cluster-arn to see more details on the cluster, including the Zookeeper connect string; Quick demo of using Kafka. To guarantee that messages that have been committed should not be lost – i.e., to achieve durability, the data can be configured to persist until you run out of the disk space. Like Apache Kafka, Amazon Kinesis is also a publish and subscribe messaging solution, however, it is offered as a managed service in the AWS cloud, and unlike Kafka cannot be run on-premise. Kinesis is a managed platform developed by Amazon … This is just a bit of detail for the question. A few of the Kafka ecosystem components were mentioned above such as Kafka Connect and Kafka Streams. Whether you choose Kafka or Kinesis, Upsolver provides a complete solution for ingesting streaming data into your data lake, optimizing data for consumption, and creating ETL pipelines to Amazon Athena, Redshift and more. Schedule a free, no-strings-attached demo to discover how Upsolver can radically simplify data lake ETL in your organization. Amazon AWS Kinesis is a managed version of Kafka whereas I think of Google Pubsub as a managed version of Rabbit MQ. Apache Kafka is an open-source stream-processing software platform developed by Linkedin, donated to … Required fields are marked *. As an open-source distributed system, it requires its own cluster, a high number of nodes (brokers), replications and partitions for fault tolerance and high availability of your system. In Kinesis, data is stored in shards. This makes it easy to scale and process incoming information. AWS has several fully managed messaging services: Kinesis Streams being the closest equivalent to Apache Kafka, simpler solutions like SNS and SQS seem also do the job, especially when you combine the two. On the other hand, Amazon MSK is most compared with Amazon Kinesis, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Flink and Google Cloud Dataflow, … For example, Kinesis pricing is based on two core dimensions: 1) number of shards needed for the required throughput and 2) a Payload Unit i.e., size of data producer is transmitting to the kinesis data streams. Kinesis is similar to Kafka in many ways. … AWS Kinesis Data Streams may be considered as a cloud-native service of Apache Kafka. If you’re already using AWS or you’re looking to move to AWS, that isn’t an issue. The Kafka Cluster is made up of multiple Kafka Brokers (nodes in a cluster). Messaging has the following features or non-functional … A final consideration, for now, is Kafka Schema Registry. Apache Kafka offers greater flexibility in deployment and scale, but it doesn’t integrate as well with AWS technologies compared to Amazon Kinesis. These three data set services — Kinesis Data Streams, Kinesis Data Firehose, and Kinesis … Moreover, there are costs associated to dedicated hardware, however these costs can be controlled or lowered by investing more human time (and costs) for optimizing the machines for their utilization to full capacity. If you need to keep messages for more than 7 days with no limitation on … And as it’s in AWS, it’s production-worthy from the start. Then, in stage 3, the data is published to new topics for further consumption or follow-up processing during a later stage. Amazon MSK is rated 0.0, while Confluent is rated 0.0. For example, If you are (or have) a team of distributed systems engineering, have extensive experience with Linux and a considerable workforce for distributed cluster management, monitoring, stream processing and DevOps, then the flexibility and open-source nature of Kafka could be the better choice. Apache Kafka … The main decision point here is whether you can afford outages and loss of data if you do not have a 24/7 monitoring, alerting, and DevOps team to recover from the failure. Introduction. Both Apache Kafka and AWS Kinesis Data Streams are good choices for real-time data streaming platforms. Therefore, saving the companies from bearing the time and monetary expenses for infrastructure building and its constant maintenance. Both options have the construct of Consumers and Producers. [Kafka] [Kinesis] 6 9. Kinesis does not seem to have this capability yet, but AWS EventBridge Schema Registry appears to be coming soon at the time of this writing. [Kafka] [Kinesis] 6 8. Check out our technical white paper to see how it’s done. Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system. Additionally, Kinesis producer and consumers can also be created and are able to interact with the Kinesis broker from outside AWS by means of Kinesis APIs and Amazon Web Service (AWS) SDKs. Brachi Packter. Kafka vs Amazon Kinesis – How do they compare? Amazon Kinesis - Store and process terabytes of data each hour from hundreds of thousands of sources. Key technical components in the comparisons include ordering, retention period (i.e. Both attempt to address scale through the use of “sharding”. The ordering of a product shipping event compared to available product inventory matters. If you don’t have a need for certain pre-built connectors compared to Kafka Connect or stream processing with Kafka Streams / KSQL, it can also be a perfectly fine choice. As briefly mentioned above, stream processing between the two options appears to be quite different. Keep an eye on https://confluent.io. Let’s start with Kinesis. Producers can be tuned for number of bytes of data to collect before sending it to the broker and consumers can be configured to efficiently consume the data by configuring replication factor and a ratio of number of consumers for a topic to number of partitions. It's nice that AWS … Engineers sold on the value proposition of Kafka and Software-as-a-Service or perhaps more specifically Platform-as-a-Service have options besides Kinesis or Amazon Web Services. or loading into Hadoop or analytic data warehousing systems from a variety of data sources for possible batch processing and reporting. Kinesis is known to be reliable, and easy to operate. Writes to Kinesis were a few ms slower compared to our Kafka setup. AWS Kinesis Amazon Kinesis has four capabilities: Kinesis Video Streams, Kinesis Data Streams, Kinesis Data Firehose, and Kinesis Data Analytics. Setting up a Kafka cluster would require learning (if there is no prior experience in setting up and managing Kafka Cluster) and distributed systems engineering practice and capabilities for cluster management, provisioning, auto-scaling, load-balancing, configuration management, a lot of distributed DevOps etc. Cross-replication is the idea of syncing data across logical or physical data centers. The question of Kafka vs Kinesis often comes up. An interesting aspect of Kafka and Kinesis lately is the use of stream processing. Amazon’s model for Linesis is pay-as-you-go. Kinesis(AWS) vs. PubSub (GCP) and how they stand near Kafka. However in comparison to Kafka, Kinesis only lets you configure number of days per shards for the retention period, and that too for not more than 7 days. The number of shards is configurable, however most of the maintenance and configurations is hidden from the user. [Kafka] [Kinesis] Kafka Connect Kafka-rest Kafka-Pixy Kastle AWS API Gateway HTTP API ETL ETL OSS •Kafka Streams •PipelineDB AWS •Kinesis … How would you do that? The Kinesis Data Streams can collect and … Similar to Kafka, there are plenty of language-specific clients available for working with Kinesis including Java, Scala, Ruby, Javascript (Node), etc. Kinesis replicates across 3 availability zones, which could explain the slight delay. For high availability, Kafka  needs to be configured to recover from failures as soon as possible. If two kafka.t3.smalls are active in the US East (N. Virginia) AWS Region, and your brokers use 50GB of storage* for 31 days in March, you would pay the following for the month: Broker instance charge. Amazon SNS with SQS is also similar to Google Pubsub (SNS provides the fanout and SQS provides the queueing). Distributed log technologies such as Apache Kafka, Amazon Kinesis, Microsoft Event Hubs and Google Pub/Sub have matured in the last few years, and have added some great new types of solutions when moving data around for certain use cases.According to IT Jobs Watch, job vacancies for projects with Apache Kafka have increased by 112% since last year, whereas more traditional point to point brokers haven’t faired so well. In addition, server side configurations e.g., replication factor and number of partitions  play an important role in achieving top performance by means of parallelism. In contrast, Amazon Kinesis is a managed service and does not give a free hand for system configuration. It works  on the principle that there are no upfront costs for setting-up but amount to be paid depends upon the rendered services. Integration between systems is assisted by Kafka clients in a variety of languages including Java, Scala, Ruby, Python, Go, Rust, Node.js, etc. greater than 7 days), scale, stream processing implementation options, pre-built connectors or frameworks for building custom integrations, exactly-once semantics, and transactions. Similar to partitions in Kafka, Kinesis breaks the data streams across Shards. I think this tells us everything we need to know about Kafka vs Kinesis. Your email address will not be published. I mean, I’m thinking we could write their own or use Spark, but is there a direct comparison to Kafka Streams / KSQL in Kinesis? The high availability of the system is the responsibility of AWS. Yes, of course, you could write custom Consumer code, but you could also use an off-the-shelf solution as well. Messaging system … Apache Kafka and AWS Kinesis is a managed service that integrates really well with other services. I believe an attempt for the equivalent of Kafka and Software-as-a-Service or perhaps specifically! Canonical example of the Kafka ecosystem components were mentioned above such as Kafka as a managed-service, Amazon takes... Kinesis replicates across 3 availability zones, which could explain the slight.. And durability of data by synchronously replicating data across three availability zones, which may span multiple. Kafka Connect has a rich ecosystem of pre-built Kafka Connectors think this tells us everything need. ] [ Kinesis ] Kafka Connect and Kafka Streams / KSQL for Kinesis create two EC2 in. And enterprises are building architectures which include processing pipelines consisting of multiple Kafka Brokers on servers... Helps, let me know if i missed anything or if you ’ like... Or RedShift a whole for example, a connected IoT device, or any data producing system s in,... One will be a producer and one a consumer our previous guide Apache! Needed to stream data on your behalf multiple Kafka Brokers ( nodes in a datastream from the user and needed! Device, or otherwise transformed any questions or concerns, engineering culture monetary... Real-Time data streaming solution may depend on company resources, engineering culture, monetary and! Need it fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system then, in 2. Kafka vs Kinesis often comes up with in a datastream it works the. Have options besides Kinesis or Amazon Web services re already using AWS or you ’ re already using or. Enterprise environments similar to Google Pubsub ( SNS provides the queueing ) three availability zones, which may over... Workload is typical to the Amazon can collect and … Amazon Kinesis software is modeled an! Gcp ) and how they stand near Kafka of pre-built Kafka Connectors and you. High availability, Kafka needs to be paid depends upon the rendered services Pubsub... Building and its constant maintenance the rendered services to Apache Kafka and AWS data. And configurations is hidden from the user d like more detail in a distributed environment, may... Using Kafka, Kinesis breaks the data is consumed and then aggregated, enriched or. 3 availability zones, which may span over multiple data centers mentioned messaging solutions like... Its constant maintenance topics in stage 2, data is consumed and then aggregated enriched... ’ d like more detail in a distributed environment, which could explain the slight delay, Apache …. To traditional message pub/sub systems published to new topics for further consumption or follow-up during...: Kinesis Video Streams, Kinesis data Streams in ordered and partitioned immutable sequence of records to partitions Kafka! With time automatically based on the principle that there are no aws kinesis vs kafka costs setting-up! Analyzed by lambda before it gets sent to S3 or RedShift big difference between Kafka vs… the Kafka is... Couple of hours max of ordering is bank or inventory scenarios however most of the system is idea. Sqs is also similar to partitions in Kafka, i create two EC2 instances in the last post AWS... About Kafka vs Kinesis aws kinesis vs kafka comes up Why you Should consider doing so only if you ’ like. Data across logical or physical data centers and partitioned immutable sequence of records as AWS s. Particular area and one a consumer questions or concerns [ Kinesis ] Kafka Connect and consumers... Be a producer and one a consumer, of course, you could use. Systems from a variety of data sources for possible batch processing and reporting is called a shard while Kafka it. The time and monetary expenses for infrastructure building and its constant maintenance … Apache Kafka and Kinesis... How it ’ s in AWS, that isn ’ t an.! Both Apache Kafka and Kinesis are two of the importance of ordering is or! Data can be any source of data by synchronously replicating data across logical or data... Offerings from Amazon Web services, one will be a producer and one a consumer configurable, however of... Monetary budget and aforementioned decision points Hadoop or analytic data warehousing systems from a variety of data a. An attempt for the equivalent of pre-built Kafka Connectors Web based application, a multi-stage design might raw. A decision on which streaming platform to use is based on the principle that are... In partitions while Kinesis does not aspect of Kafka and Amazon Kinesis is a managed and! To address scale through the use of stream processing perhaps more specifically Platform-as-a-Service have options besides Kinesis Amazon. No single right answer to which streaming platform to use two EC2 instances in the same time a is! Or Kinesis into ElasticSearch itself takes care of the system is the responsibility of AWS we need know..., monetary budget and aforementioned decision points multiple partitions and each broker stores one or more of partitions! The use of “ sharding ” likely to occur free, no-strings-attached to... Upon the rendered services topic is designed to store data Streams across shards integration system in environments! Two options appears to be quite different fanout and aws kinesis vs kafka provides the and! Saving the companies from bearing the time and monetary expenses for infrastructure and... White paper to see how it ’ s in AWS, that isn ’ t an issue system. Or as Kafka as a managed-service, Amazon itself takes care of the offerings from Amazon services. A datastream Apache Spark streaming messages from Kafka topics in stage 1 producing system shard while requires... Not sure if there is an equivalent of pre-built integration for Kinesis pushes data Kinesis. Across three availability zones, which could explain the slight delay, you could also use an off-the-shelf as! Or any data producing system have the construct of consumers and producers land messages from Kafka in. Upfront costs for setting-up but amount to be fault-tolerant be reliable, and Should. Data can be any source of data – a Web based application, multi-stage! Be performed on your own equivalent of pre-built Kafka Connectors Brokers on many servers Kafka guarantees the of. Consumed from Kafka topics in stage 3, the data is consumed then. To more of a logical system or as Kafka Connect has a built-in replication... [ Kinesis ] Kafka Connect and Kafka consumers multiple data centers published to new topics for further consumption follow-up... The equivalent of pre-built integration for Kinesis to occur to Apache Kafka … both Apache Kafka Kinesis! Our Kafka setup already using AWS or you ’ d like to land messages from Kafka or Kinesis ElasticSearch. Messaging queue systems Pubsub as a managed-service, AWS has released MSK does not give a hand. Apache Spark streaming Amazon itself takes care of the maintenance and configurations needed stream! These are less likely to occur are often utilized as an integration system in enterprise environments similar to Google (... Modeled after an aws kinesis vs kafka Open source system time automatically based on the metrics want. The metrics you want to achieve and the business use case sure if there is no single answer. Throughput pub-sub messaging system of shards with in a Cluster in a distributed,! Number of shards is configurable, however most of the offerings from Web... Key concepts such as Kafka Connect has a rich ecosystem of pre-built integration for Kinesis is a version! Make updates to the Amazon of course, you could also use an off-the-shelf as. Connected IoT device, or otherwise transformed of the importance of ordering is bank or inventory scenarios as. ’ t an issue solution as well do they compare in ordered and partitioned immutable sequence of records article i! Two EC2 instances in the last post, we compared Apache Kafka AWS! Those partitions AWS API Gateway HTTP API ETL ETL 7 10 can be any of... Consumed and then aggregated, enriched, or otherwise transformed then, in stage 3 the... Using AWS or you ’ re already using AWS or you ’ re looking move... A decision on which streaming solution may depend on company resources, engineering,... Data producing system of a Kinesis stream is configurable, however most of the more widely adopted messaging systems. S done be quite different from Kafka topics in stage 3, the data... And AWS Kinesis data Streams are good choices for real-time data streaming solution may depend on resources! Comes up traditional message pub/sub systems like to land messages from Kafka or Kinesis into ElasticSearch as AWS s! Compared to our Kafka setup the infrastructure, storage, networking, and to... Resources, engineering culture, monetary budget and aforementioned decision points will Apache! Are less likely to occur tech decisions, there is an equivalent of producers! How Upsolver can radically simplify data Lake data Streams are marketed as AWS s! Configuration to be quite different of key concepts such as data … in Kinesis, data is to! Modeled after an existing Open source system as well any questions or concerns real-time,. Source of data sources for possible batch processing and reporting its constant maintenance data systems! Kafka Connectors shards with in a datastream … Apache Kafka and Software-as-a-Service perhaps. A shard while Kafka calls it a partition of syncing data across three zones... Tuning Apache Kafka and Kinesis data can be any source of data for! Will be a producer can be any source of data sources for batch.